Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Posted: 2020-01-18T00:30:31Z | Updated: 2020-01-18T00:30:31Z Here's How Trump's Impeachment Differs From A Criminal Trial | HuffPost

Here's How Trump's Impeachment Differs From A Criminal Trial

In Trumps trial, the Senate will serve as both judge and jury and the Republicans who control the chamber can forge their own rules if they have enough votes.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Yes, it’s a trial — but the Senate’s impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump won’t resemble anything Americans have seen on Court TV.

In Trump’s trial, the Senate will serve as both judge and jury. The Republicans who control the chamber can forge their own rules if they have enough votes. And the presiding judge is the top one in America, yet can be decisively overruled.

A look at some of the key differences between a courtroom trial and the impeachment trial that will play out in the coming days:

THE JUDGE

COURTROOM TRIAL: Federal trials, both civil and criminal, are presided over by District Court judges who are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. They rule on questions of evidence, motions to dismiss a case or to exclude certain testimony, and all other disputes that emerge both before and during the trial.

SENATE TRIAL: None other than John Roberts, the chief justice of the United States, will preside over this case. He made the short trip Thursday from the Supreme Court to the Capitol to be sworn in. Exactly what role he’ll play is unclear, though it may be a modest one in keeping with his insistence that judges aren’t meant to be politicians. And even if Roberts were to make a ruling from the chair, 51 senators can vote to overrule him.

____

THE JURY

COURTROOM TRIAL: It’s a bedrock principle of American jurisprudence, and enshrined in the Constitution, that defendants have the right to have their fate decided by a jury of their peers — ordinary citizens who, by design, are meant to lack personal connections to the parties, or other biases or motives that could sway their judgment. They’re questioned in advance on their ability to evaluate the evidence fairly and impartially.

SENATE TRIAL: The jury pool here is already preordained under the Constitution and neither side gets any say in who gets to hear the case. The 100 senators who make up the chamber will decide the case, invariably bringing their own partisan leanings toward one side or the other. They’re not required to check any political prejudices or biases at the door — nor will they. They’re also not impassive observers, carrying the power on a majority vote to approve rules or even dismiss the charges.

____

THE WITNESSES

COURTROOM TRIAL: The attorneys for both sides get to call the witnesses they think will bolster their side of the case. The lawyers themselves handle the direct questioning and cross-examination, though judges may also ask clarifying questions. Jurors are not invited to interrupt the proceedings with their own questions, nor do they get to decide whether witnesses are called.

SENATE TRIAL: The senators themselves, in their roles as jurors, will have the opportunity to submit questions in writing. Under the rules, senators can even be called as witnesses in the trial. And it’s not even automatic that there will be witnesses: It requires 51 votes for witnesses to be called.

____

THE PROSECUTORS

COURTROOM TRIAL: Federal criminal cases are tried by prosecutors who work for the Justice Department, their names generally unfamiliar to the American public. In state and local proceedings, those prosecutors are often known as assistant district attorneys. They don’t align themselves with particular political parties or affiliations.

SENATE TRIAL: The prosecutors here aren’t prosecutors in the traditional sense. They’re actually seven Democratic members of Congress, all selected by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and given the title of “manager.” Some of the seven are familiar faces from their time leading congressional investigations into Trump, including Rep. Adam Schiff of California and Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York.

____

THE VERDICT

COURTROOM TRIAL: To declare a defendant guilty in a criminal case, either on the state or federal level, a jury must be unanimous in its decision — no exceptions. If a jury can’t reach a verdict after a prolonged period of deliberations, then a judge can declare it as deadlocked and dismiss it from duty.

SENATE TRIAL: No such unanimity is required here. It would take a two-thirds majority of senators, 67 if all 100 are voting, to convict the president. Since Republicans make up the majority of the Senate, a conviction is seen as unlikely. If Trump were convicted on either of the two articles against him, he would automatically be removed from office.

_____

Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/etuckerAP

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost

Before You Go

10 Podcasts That Explain The Process Of Impeachment
"We the People"(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: Created by the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, this podcast uses the Constitution as a framework for insightful, nonpartisan discussions about major contemporary issues with politicians, historians, journalists, authors and more.

Try this episode: "Presidential succession and the 25th Amendment at 50 "
(credit:National Constitution Center)
"Civics 101"(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is:This podcast started in the wake of the Trump administration, banking on the fact that people who had little interest in civics before would now care to understand the logistics of how government works.

Try this episode: "Congressional Investigations "
(credit:NHPR)
"Decode DC"(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: Decode DC ought to be your go-to place for any explanation of D.C., whether you want to find out why certain things work the way they do or how policies affect real people. It is honest and trustworthy but also entertaining, and never didactic.

Try this episode:
"Trump is at odds with the courts. Has a president ever defied them? "
(credit:The Scripps Washington Bureau)
"Can He Do That?"(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: The Washington Post takes the question heard around America and tries to tackle it from a different angle every week. Focused exclusively on Donald Trumps unique and historic presidency, this podcast seeks to break down and explain the legality and moral implications of Trumps most controversial moves.

Try this episode: "Is Trump in violation of his contract with the American people? "
(credit:Washington Post)
"Waking Up"(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: Sam Harris is a neuroscientist, philosopher, and best-selling author, and his podcast reflects his background; your own ideas and assumptions will be tested as Harris open your mind to new ways of considering current events and societal issues.

Try this episode: "The Path to Impeachment "
(credit:Sam Harris)
"Pod Save America"(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: "Pod Save America " is the hilarious, informal, overtly Democratic Four space that four former aides to President Obama have created for themselves to have uncensored yet intelligent discussions about the political world; expect plenty of Trump criticism, but in a leveled and constructive manner, as well as lots of (often silly) jokes.

Try this episode: "Literally farcical "
(credit:Crooked Media)
"Congressional Dish"(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: Thanks to "Schoolhouse Rock," you know how a bill turns into law, but the nitty gritty details of how bills mutate through the halls of Washington on their way through Congress is a more sophisticated ordeal. Host Jennifer Briney always has very detailed information on the often unknown details of the inception of several bills.

Try this episode: "Trumps First Laws "
(credit:Jennifer Briney)
"Slate's Political Gabfest"(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: Subscribe to this podcast to get the chance to listen to a group of outspoken and intelligent politics journalists let their hair down and just talk.

Try this episode: "The 'Tuesday Night Massacre' Edition "
(credit:Slate/Panoply)
"Left, Right & Center"(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: If youre interested in challenging your own political beliefs, whatever they may be, then tune into this witty weekly podcast that pits three highly intelligent people from the left, the center and the right against each other in a productive chat about politics and pop culture.

Try this episode: "No one knew governing could be so hard "
(credit:KCRW)
"So That Happened"(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
What it is: From the HuffPost politics team, "So That Happened " aims to explain whats happening in politics in a detailed, insider way to everyone who is an admitted outsider."

Try this episode: "Donald Trump Is Lighting His Presidency On Fire "
(credit:HuffPost)