House Republicans Fail To Impeach DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas

In a stunning blow to Republican leaders, the House rejected an effort to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Tuesday after a number of Republicans joined Democrats in opposing it.

The final vote was 214 to 216. 

The vote was incredibly dramatic. It was tied 215 to 215 for several minutes, with every Democrat voting no along with three Republicans : Reps. Ken Buck (Colo.), Tom McClintock (Calif.) and Mike Gallagher (Wis.). A tied vote meant the effort would fail, so Democrats began shouting Order! at Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to drop the gavel and end it.

Republicans were furiously prodding Gallagher to change his vote, but he wouldnt. In the end, Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah) voted no, not because he opposed it but because it allows the House to bring up the bill again another day. That bumped the final tally to 214-216.

GOP leaders appeared to be counting on one Democrat to be absent in order to squeak through the vote: Rep. Al Green of Texas. He had been out following surgery. But he unexpectedly showed up for Tuesdays vote.

I always intended to be here, Green told reporters after the vote. I had surgery. Im recovering, but this was important.

Johnson is already signaling hell try again when hes certain he has the votes. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) missed the vote for medical reasons, so he could give the GOP that one extra vote it needs when he returns.

House Republicans fully intend to bring Articles of Impeachment against Secretary Mayorkas back to the floor when we have the votes for passage, his spokesman Raj Shah tweeted after the failed vote .

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), the sponsor of the impeachment resolution, downplayed the failed vote. She repeatedly said that Scalise, who is recovering from cancer treatment, could return as soon as next week to be the GOPs solid yes.

This is not over yet, she told reporters after the vote. We can still bring back Steve Scalise.

Still, Tuesdays vote was an epic fail for GOP leaders, who have been angling to impeach Mayorkas for months. The entire effort is a stunt to help Donald Trump look tough on border issues ahead of Novembers presidential election. The GOPs two articles of impeachment accused Mayorkas of willful refusal to comply with immigration laws, and of breaching public trust.

But they never produced any evidence that Mayorkas had committed crimes let alone crimes that meet the threshold for impeachable offenses. The Constitution spells out that impeachment is reserved for rare instances of high crimes and misdemeanors , like bribery or treason.

In the case of Mayorkas, a Cabinet secretary charged with carrying out immigration laws, the GOP was essentially attacking him for policies it doesnt like.

In the lead-up to the vote, Johnson, who is a constitutional lawyer, touted his legal credentials and said he had no choice but to impeach.

In my review and my understanding and everything Ive known and read and studied over the years, I dont believe theres ever been a Cabinet secretary who was so blatantly, openly, willfully and without remorse did exactly the opposite of what the federal law requires him to do, Johnson said in a press conference. Its an extreme measure, but extreme times call for extreme measures.

But a number of Republicans found Johnsons rhetoric unpersuasive, saying that while they may not agree with the Biden administrations policies, it would be pointless and unconstitutional to impeach Mayorkas.

The problem is that they fail to identify an impeachable crime that Mayorkas has committed, McClintock said early Tuesday in a 10-page memo criticizing his partys effort.

In effect, they stretch and distort the Constitution in order to hold the administration accountable for stretching and distorting the law, he said.

McClintock echoed the previous sentiments of Buck, who was the first Republican to announce his opposition to impeachment.

Its maladministration. [Mayorkas is] terrible. The border is a disaster, Buck told reporters last Thursday. But thats not impeachable.

House Republicans could change immigration policies they dont like by passing bipartisan legislation through Congress. Theyve spent months screaming about the need to address border security, and in the Senate, some Republicans actually put in the work and unveiled a long-awaited bill this week with bipartisan support to change immigration policies.

But they hit a snag: Trump.

The GOP presidential front-runner last month inserted himself into Senate negotiations and personally ordered his party not to pass any bipartisan border bills, because they would give President Joe Biden a win ahead of the November presidential election.

Torn between angering Trump and looking pathetic by not tackling the border problems theyve been vowing to address, House Republicans settled on going after Mayorkas.

Even if they had been successful in impeaching Mayorkas, the impeachment articles would have gone nowhere in the Senate.

There have already been many shameful and embarrassing moments in this Republican House majority, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said last week. But abusing the Constitution by pursuing this sham impeachment effort is a new, ignominious low.

And let this be clear: This unserious spectacle by House Republicans does nothing nothing to secure our border, he said.

Republican senators didnt want anything to do with the Houses impeachment effort, either.

Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) called it the dumbest exercise and use of time.

Whats rich to me is the speaker says the [border] bill in the Senate is ... dead on arrival, Cramer told reporters on Tuesday. And then they proceed with impeaching a cabinet secretary, which is obviously dead on arrival.

Jonathan Nicholson and Igor Bobic contributed reporting.