Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Posted: 2024-02-21T22:18:08Z | Updated: 2024-02-21T22:18:08Z Home Depot Broke Law By Making Workers Remove 'Black Lives Matter,' NLRB Rules | HuffPost

Home Depot Broke Law By Making Workers Remove 'Black Lives Matter,' NLRB Rules

One employee was told if they wore "BLM" on their uniforms, then management would have to let others wear swastikas, according to trial testimony.

In a win for social justice advocates in the workplace, the National Labor Relations Board ruled Wednesday that big-box retailer Home Depot broke the law by requiring workers to remove Black Lives Matter insignia from their uniforms and punishing one for refusing to do so.

The boards majority wrote in their decision that employees sporting the letters BLM on their attire as they pushed management on race issues amounted to protected concerted activity, and was therefore shielded by the law. They ordered Home Depot to offer reinstatement and back pay to a worker whod resigned rather than remove their BLM marking.

The NLRB enforces collective bargaining law on private-sector employers, and its five-member board in Washington serves as a high court for resolving labor disputes. (At the moment, there are only four members.) The BLM ruling falls in line with the boards more progressive reading of the law under a Democratic majority shaped by President Joe Biden.

One employee was told that if they wore 'BLM' on their uniforms, then management would have to let others wear swastikas, according to trial testimony.

The boards lone Republican member dissented.

According to the NLRB decision, a Home Depot manager had told the workers they had to take off their BLM insignia because it conflicted with the companys dress code. One employee was told that if they wore BLM on their uniforms, then management would have to let others wear swastikas, according to trial testimony.

A Home Depot spokesperson said the company disagrees with the decision.

The Home Depot is fully committed to diversity and respect for all people. We dont tolerate any kind of workplace harassment or discrimination, the spokesperson said.

The company declined to say whether it plans to appeal the ruling to federal court.

The labor boards decision reversed an earlier ruling by an administrative law judge who heard the case and determined that the workers BLM protest wasnt protected because it wasnt specifically tied to issues at their workplace. Instead, the judge found, Black Lives Matter served as a political umbrella for societal concerns, rather than for a particular work grievance.

We reject that reasoning, the board members wrote. Neither the origins of BLM messaging, nor its primary use, dictate how the BLM marking may be used or understood in a particular workplace context (or, indeed, in a broader setting).

Open Image Modal
A Home Depot store is seen on Feb. 20 in Austin, Texas.
Brandon Bell via Getty Images

The Home Depot dispute arose at a store in the Minneapolis suburb of New Brighton, Minnesota, in the months following the 2020 murder of George Floyd , a Black man, by Minneapolis police officers. Floyds death sparked Black Lives Matter protests around the country. 

Workers at the New Brighton store were dealing with what they said were several racist incidents at the time. One co-worker had exhibited racial bias toward customers and fellow employees, the NLRB decision states, to the point where other workers would intercept customers of color so they wouldnt have to deal with the employee in question. Black History Month displays in the store had been vandalized, and some workers felt that managers didnt sufficiently address what had happened.

The worker who was unlawfully punished, Antonio Morales, pressed management on the vandalism incident and wound up getting reprimanded for wearing BLM marked on a work apron. 

The Home Depot case is one of several before the board involving racial justice messages at work.

This was the first time that a manager or supervisor had said anything about the BLM marking even though Morales had worn it continuously for the prior 5 months, the decision states.

The Home Depot case is one of several before the board involving racial justice messages at work.

In December, one of the agencys administrative law judges ruled that Whole Foods did not break the law when it told workers to remove their Black Lives Matter gear, saying the protest wasnt directly tied to their working conditions.

The fact that BLM may be a movement of great significance to African Americans, and that its goals are valid, does not mean that a rule prohibiting the displaying of such messages at work is racist, as some employees implied, the judge wrote.

That case is on appeal before the board in Washington.

Support HuffPost

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Whether you come to HuffPost for updates on the 2024 presidential race, hard-hitting investigations into critical issues facing our country today, or trending stories that make you laugh, we appreciate you. The truth is, news costs money to produce, and we are proud that we have never put our stories behind an expensive paywall.

Would you join us to help keep our stories free for all? Your will go a long way.

Support HuffPost