WASHINGTON Republicans continued to insist this week that President Donald Trump did nothing wrong even after several top diplomats in his administration confirmed that he did, in fact, attempt a quid pro quo by withholding aid to Ukraine in exchange for an investigation into a political opponent.
This type of diplomacy is sometimes not fun to watch, but nonetheless, it has existed. It hardly rises to an impeachable offense, Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) said Wednesday.
House impeachment investigators this week released bombshell testimony from two witnesses underscoring the lengths Trump went to in urging Ukraine to open an investigation into Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who served on the board of Burisma, a Ukrainian gas company, while his father was in office.
That was my clear understanding, security assistance money would not come until the [Ukrainian] President committed to pursue the investigation, Bill Taylor, the acting U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, said in his deposition transcript that was released Wednesday.
Gordon Sondland, the Trump donor who was appointed ambassador to the European Union, on Monday revised the testimony he gave last month, acknowledging that he was involved in Trumps attempted quid pro quo with Ukraines government after previously claiming he could not recall the details. In his updated statement, Sondland said he now recalled telling an aide to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Sept. 1 that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine issued a public statement announcing an investigation into Burisma.
But Senate Republicans waived off the revelations by expressing deep skepticism and even outright denial, characterizing the testimony from the two officials as much ado about nothing.
Regardless of how many people you bring out to make the point, I dont think thats going to do the job for most of us to change our opinion, said Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.), adding that he preferred to rely instead on the summary of Trumps July 25 call with Zelensky, which he argued showed no quid pro quo.
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) also said he doubted the existence of a quid pro quo because Trump had personally told him in a conversation in late August that there was none.
I think the question that still needs to be asked OK, Sondland was doing these things, hes talking to different people was the president aware of any of these things? ... When I talked to him Aug. 31, he vehemently denied it, Johnson said, referring to Trump.
Johnson, who serves as the vice chair of the Senate Ukraine Caucus, also took issue with the media, accusing it of mischaracterizing Trumps requests to Ukraine that it investigate the 2016 presidential election and the origins of Robert Muellers special counsel investigation.
The news media is always saying, Hes trying to dig up dirt on this 2020 opponent, Johnson said. No, hes trying to figure out what happened in 2016.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a top Trump ally, has veered in his response to the controversy from saying he would not read any of the House impeachment transcripts because they are a bunch of B.S, to throwing out yet another argument on Wednesday: that Trumps administration was simply too incompetent to carry out the quid pro quo.
What I can tell you about the Trump policy toward the Ukraine, it was incoherent, it depends on who you talk to. They seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo, Graham said .
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), who is a lawyer, approached the matter a wholly different way. He argued that Trump may have engaged in a quid pro quo but that it could have been appropriate if the president had a legitimate motive.
The quid pro quo is a red herring unless you make a distinction between a legal quid pro quo and an illegal quid pro quo, Kennedy said. All youre talking about is the presidents motive; whether he had a good faith basis to do what he did.
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
It's Another Trump-Biden Showdown And We Need Your Help
The Future Of Democracy Is At Stake
Our 2024 Coverage Needs You
Your Loyalty Means The World To Us
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
The 2024 election is heating up, and women's rights, health care, voting rights, and the very future of democracy are all at stake. Donald Trump will face Joe Biden in the most consequential vote of our time. And HuffPost will be there, covering every twist and turn. America's future hangs in the balance. Would you consider contributing to support our journalism and keep it free for all during this critical season?
HuffPost believes news should be accessible to everyone, regardless of their ability to pay for it. We rely on readers like you to help fund our work. Any contribution you can make even as little as $2 goes directly toward supporting the impactful journalism that we will continue to produce this year. Thank you for being part of our story.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
It's official: Donald Trump will face Joe Biden this fall in the presidential election. As we face the most consequential presidential election of our time, HuffPost is committed to bringing you up-to-date, accurate news about the 2024 race. While other outlets have retreated behind paywalls, you can trust our news will stay free.
But we can't do it without your help. Reader funding is one of the key ways we support our newsroom. Would you consider making a donation to help fund our news during this critical time? Your contributions are vital to supporting a free press.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
As Americans head to the polls in 2024, the very future of our country is at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a free press is critical to creating well-informed voters. That's why our journalism is free for everyone, even though other newsrooms retreat behind expensive paywalls.
Our journalists will continue to cover the twists and turns during this historic presidential election. With your help, we'll bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes you can't find elsewhere. Reporting in this current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly, and we thank you for your support.
Contribute as little as $2 to keep our news free for all.
Can't afford to donate? Support HuffPost by creating a free account and log in while you read.
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. Would you consider becoming a regular HuffPost contributor?
Dear HuffPost Reader
Thank you for your past contribution to HuffPost. We are sincerely grateful for readers like you who help us ensure that we can keep our journalism free for everyone.
The stakes are high this year, and our 2024 coverage could use continued support. If circumstances have changed since you last contributed, we hope you'll consider contributing to HuffPost once more.
Support HuffPost Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.