Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Politics

Trudeau cabinet approves Trans Mountain, Line 3 pipelines, rejects Northern Gateway

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet colleagues have signed off on two major pipelines, projects that will pump nearly a million more barrels of oil a day from Alberta's oilsands to global markets, if they are constructed.

Projects will pump nearly a million more barrels of oil a day from Alberta's oilsands to global markets

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announces his government is approving Kinder Morgan's proposal to triple the capacity of its Trans Mountain pipeline from Alberta to Burnaby, B.C. a $6.8-billion project that has sparked protests by climate change activists. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet colleagues signed off on two major pipelines today, projects that will pump nearly a million more barrels of oil a day from Alberta's oilsands to global markets, if they are constructed.

Ottawa gave the green light to Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain pipelineand Enbridge's Line 3, while it rejected Northern Gateway.

The prime minister said production from Alberta's oilsandsis increasing, and current pipeline infrastructure will soon be at capacity.

"The decision we took today is the one that is in the best interests of Canada," Trudeau said in announcing his government's support for the two major projects. "It is a major win for Canadian workers, for Canadian familiesand the Canadian economy, now and into the future."

He said Canada is still a "climate leader," and pointed to Alberta's plan to cap greenhouse gas emissions from the oil patch at 100 megatonnes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions a year.

Trudeau and Alberta Premier Rachel Notley shake hands during a meeting on Parliament Hill after the federal cabinet gave the green light to Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain expansion and Enbridge's Line 3. (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)

Trudeau said that if these projects aren't built, diluted bitumen would be forced into more rail tanker cars for transport.

"That is less economic, and more dangerous for communities, and is higher in terms of greenhouse gas emissions thanmodern pipelines would be."

The government has beenlayingthe groundwork for approving a major pipeline, courting green-conscious voters with plans to imposea national price on carbon,phase out coal-powered plants by 2030and overhaul the National Energy Board, the country's regulator.

Today,Trudeaualso announced that the government would ban crude oil tankersalongB.C.'s North Coast, promising legislation in the new year to implement a moratorium.

Trans Mountain

The controversial Trans Mountain expansion project will nearly triple the capacity of an existing pipeline to 890,000 barrels a day.

This $6.8-billion, 1,150-kilometre twinned pipeline will move a mix of oil products from Edmonton to a terminal in Burnaby, B.C., near Vancouver, where it will be exported to markets in Asia. Some of the product is also destined for Chevron's Vancouver-area refinery.
Kinder Morgan's $6.8-billion, 1,150-kilometre Trans Mountain pipeline will move a mix of oil products from Edmonton to a terminal in Burnaby, B.C., near Vancouver, where it will be exported to markets in Asia.

If constructed, the expansion will lead to a marked increase in the number of tankers travelling through the area from approximately five to 34 a month prompting concerns diluted bitumen could be released into an ecologically sensitive area.

Trudeau said the government expects Kinder Morgan to "meet and exceed" the 157 conditions the NEB imposed on the project in April, including spill-mitigation plans. He also pointed to thea $1.5-billion ocean protection planhe announced earlier this month to improve responses to tanker and fuel spills in the Pacific, Arctic and Atlantic oceans.

"If I thought this project was unsafe for the B.C. coast, I would reject it. This is a decision based on rigorous debate on science and evidence. We have not been, and will not be swayed by political arguments, be they local, regional or national," the prime minister told reporters.

Natural Resources Minister Jim Carrappointed a ministerial panel to reviewTrans Mountain in June a process separate from the NEBand commissioned Environment Canada to study the project's upstream GHG emissions.

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency estimates that the new capacity will result in roughly 13.5 to 17 megatonnes of additional GHGemissions each year.

When fully operational, the pipeline will produce20 to 26 megatonnes of emissions,the report concludes,although, it also suggests those numbers could be lower if oil prices hover below $60 a barrel, as growth in oilsands production could be curtailed.

"The approvals raise grave doubts how these and additional pipelines, including Keystone XL and Energy East, can fit with Canada's commitment to the Paris climate agreement,"Patrick DeRochie, the director of Environmental Defence, said Tuesday. "Much bigger cuts in other emission sources must be made to compensate for more oil-based emissions."

Trudeau and Ambrose on pipelines

7 years ago
Duration 1:31
Trudeau and Ambrose on pipelines

First Nation says pipeline threatens 'survival'

Activists have been lining up to oppose the project, with one B.C. First Nation near the project's route warning its construction couldthreaten thecommunity's very "survival," and it has not ruled out protests and court action.

Other First Nations, including 39 in B.C. and Alberta, have signed "mutual benefit agreements" with the project's proponent, U.S.-based Kinder Morgan. Those deals will deliver money and jobs to First Nations communities. The company also told CBC News in a statement that it has reached agreements with all First Nations communities where the project crosses a reserve.

Trudeausaid he doesn't expect all Canadians to agree with the decision, and indeedenvironmentalists were quick to denounce the approvals.

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May said she would be "willing to go to jail" to stop Trans Mountain's construction.

"Apparently Justin Trudeau's sunny ways mean dark days ahead for climate action and Indigenous reconciliation in Canada. With this announcement, Prime Minister Trudeau has broken his climate commitments, broken his commitments to Indigenous rights, and has declared war on B.C.,"Mike Hudema, a campaigner for Greenpeace, addedin a statement.

"If Prime Minister Trudeau wanted to bring Standing Rock-like protests to Canada, he succeeded."

Rachel Notley on pipeline decision

7 years ago
Duration 2:28
Alberta Premier Rachel Notley reacts to the Liberal government's pipeline decision

Community opposition has "never been stronger," Jessica Clogg, senior counsel at West Coast Environmental Law, said in a statement to CBC News. "As we've seen with Northern Gateway, that's what will prevent this pipeline from ever being built."

There have already been 11 judicial reviews launched over the NEB review, andmore court challenges are expected in the coming days.

Despite the opposition,Kinder Morgan forecasts the expansion will create 15,000 jobs a year during construction, and a further 37,000 direct and indirect jobs for every year of operation. It also estimates expanded operations will deliver an additional $46.7 billion in government revenues for all levels of government in the first 20 years. The bulk of that money, $19.4 billion, would flow to Alberta.

Construction of the expansion is slated to begin next September, with a tentative start date of December2019.

Trudeau kills Northern Gateway

In a largely expected move, cabinet killed the Enbridge-backed Northern Gateway, a proposed 1,177-kilometre pipelinethat would have carried oil from Bruderheim, Alta.,to an export terminal inKitimat, B.C.

"It has become clear that this project is not in the best interest of the local affected communities, including Indigenous Peoples," Trudeau said, describing the local area as the "jewel" of B.C.

The Enbridge-backed 1,177-kilometre Northern Gateway pipeline would have run from a terminal in Bruderheim, north of Edmonton, to Kitimat, B.C. The federal cabinet killed the project Tuesday. (CBC)

"The Great Bear Rainforest is no place for a pipeline and the Douglas Channel is no place for oil tanker traffic."

The Federal Court had previously overturned the Harpergovernment's approval of the $7.9-billion project, as it found Ottawahad not adequately consulted First Nations along the project's route. Trudeauopted Tuesday not to pursue further consultations.

Interim ConservativeLeader Rona Ambrose said she was disappointed to see the government take the projectoff the table and "kill 4,000 jobs," suggesting the terminal could have been moved farther north towardPrince Rupert.

"Today, what we saw was one project be rejected, and another project, sadly, be approved but with verylittle chance of being built," she said.

"Approval [of Trans Mountain] is just the beginning,but now he needs to use his political capital to see this project getbuilt, and I don't think he has enough of it."

Line 3

Although Enbridge's Northern Gateway is effectively dead, Line 3, the largest pipeline project in the company'shistory, will now move ahead after Tuesday's decision.

Ithas attracted considerably less attention, with fewer activists setting their sights on stopping the 1,659-kilometre project that will carry oil from a terminal nearHardisty,Alta., through northern Minnesotato Superior, Wis.

The NEB signed off on a new Line 3 in April, but with 89 conditions for the segment that runs from eastern Alberta toGretna, Man., near the Canada-U.S. border.

Line 3 is the largest pipeline project in Enbridge's history. The 1,659-kilometre project would carry oil from a terminal near Hardisty, Alta., through northern Minnesota to Superior, Wis. (CBC)

The $7.5-billion Line 3 project would nearlydouble the existing pipeline's volume to760,000 barrels a day.It would funnel oil intoEnbridge'scrown jewel, the mainline system that collectively carries three million barrels a day into the U.S.

The existing line, constructed in the1960s, has been a source of spills in the past, and the company has voluntarily dialled back capacity to address mounting maintenance issues while it pushes ahead with a replacement.

"We're pleased by the federal government's decision to approve the Line 3 replacementprogram, an essential maintenance project that will ensure the safe and reliable delivery of Canada's energy resources to market," Enbridge said in a statement. "We have strong support for the project from our communities along the route, including Indigenous communities."

At Issue | Pipeline decision

7 years ago
Duration 6:40
Who are the winners and losers in the Trudeau government's pipeline decision?